610 lines
26 KiB
Markdown
610 lines
26 KiB
Markdown
# Knowledge Hydrant
|
||
|
||
<!-- TOC -->
|
||
* [Knowledge Hydrant](#knowledge-hydrant)
|
||
* [Introduction](#introduction)
|
||
* [Concepts](#concepts)
|
||
* [Summary](#summary)
|
||
* [1. SPIRIT](#1-spirit)
|
||
* [2. ATMOSPHERE](#2-atmosphere)
|
||
* [3. ROLES](#3-roles)
|
||
* [4. CUSTOMS](#4-customs)
|
||
* [1. Spirit](#1-spirit-1)
|
||
* [1.1 Knowledge Hydrant](#11-knowledge-hydrant)
|
||
* [1.2 Pool of Insight](#12-pool-of-insight)
|
||
* [1.3 SAFE PLACE](#13-safe-place)
|
||
* [1.4 ENDURING ENERGY](#14-enduring-energy)
|
||
* [Frequent Meetings](#frequent-meetings)
|
||
* [Hour Meetings](#hour-meetings)
|
||
* [Short Breaks](#short-breaks)
|
||
* [1.5 KINDRED COLLABORATORS](#15-kindred-collaborators)
|
||
* [2. ATMOSPHERE](#2-atmosphere-1)
|
||
* [2.1 COMMON GROUND](#21-common-ground)
|
||
* [2.2 PUBLIC LIVING ROOM](#22-public-living-room)
|
||
* [2.3 INTIMATE CIRCLE](#23-intimate-circle)
|
||
* [2.4 VIRTUAL SPACE](#24-virtual-space)
|
||
* [3. ROLES](#3-roles-1)
|
||
* [3.1 ENTHUSIASTIC LEADER](#31-enthusiastic-leader)
|
||
* [3.2 MOTIVATED MODERATOR](#32-motivated-moderator)
|
||
* [Prepare thoroughly](#prepare-thoroughly)
|
||
* [Ask the opening question](#ask-the-opening-question)
|
||
* [Resuscitate deteriorating dialogues](#resuscitate-deteriorating-dialogues)
|
||
* [Handle side conversations](#handle-side-conversations)
|
||
* [Refocus by reading](#refocus-by-reading)
|
||
* [Let people speak](#let-people-speak)
|
||
* [Challenge groundless criticism](#challenge-groundless-criticism)
|
||
* [Rotate Moderators](#rotate-moderators)
|
||
* [Background Requirements](#background-requirements)
|
||
* [Elucidation Statement or Questions](#elucidation-statement-or-questions)
|
||
* [Politeness & Patience](#politeness--patience)
|
||
* [3.3 ACTIVE PARTICIPANT](#33-active-participant)
|
||
* [3.4 PREPARED PARTICIPANT](#34-prepared-participant)
|
||
* [3.5 DISTINGUISHED PARTICIPANT](#35-distinguished-participant)
|
||
* [4. CUSTOMS](#4-customs-1)
|
||
* [4.1 OPENING QUESTION](#41-opening-question)
|
||
* [4.2 SEQUENTIAL STUDY](#42-sequential-study)
|
||
* [4.3 AGENDA](#43-agenda)
|
||
* [4.4 SUBGROUP](#44-subgroup)
|
||
* [4.5 STUDY CYCLE](#45-study-cycle)
|
||
* [4.6 DISTRIBUTED DIARY](#46-distributed-diary)
|
||
* [4.7 AFTER HOURS](#47-after-hours)
|
||
<!-- TOC -->
|
||
|
||
## Introduction
|
||
|
||
A study group can make a difficult book easier to understand, it can succeed
|
||
where an unsatisfying class fails, and it can support you if your environment
|
||
doesn't support your ongoing learning and growth.
|
||
|
||
A study group is a collection of individuals who meet regularly to improve
|
||
their understanding of some non-trivial subject, like a body of great literature,
|
||
by participating in dialogue.
|
||
|
||
The authors and architects of the original pattern language understood that
|
||
individuals vary in how they obtain knowledge. Some don’t have a lot of time
|
||
and want to gain knowledge as fast as possible. Others prefer to extract as
|
||
much knowledge as they can by pondering a work’s every paragraph and
|
||
page. Still others prefer to study a work’s visual elements–its photographs
|
||
and sketches–before diving into the words.
|
||
|
||
There are 21 patterns in this pattern language. They are grouped into four
|
||
sections called Spirit, Atmosphere, Roles, and Customs. As you study the
|
||
patterns from each section, consider the structure of this language: **the
|
||
patterns from the Spirit section, at the beginning of the language, help to
|
||
define the study group's core, its spirit of learning. The patterns that follow
|
||
this section, in Atmosphere, Roles and Customs, are all intimately tied to the
|
||
earliest core patterns and serve to re-enforce them**.
|
||
|
||
## Concepts
|
||
|
||
| Concept | Meaning |
|
||
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
||
| [Great] Literature | Piece of information in it's original form, un-destiled, no summarized, etc. |
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Summary
|
||
|
||
### 1. SPIRIT
|
||
|
||
_After identifying a great source of knowledge in a subject, work to create a
|
||
rewarding, intellectually safe environment for the study of that subject._
|
||
|
||
1. KNOWLEDGE HYDRANT
|
||
2. POOL OF INSIGHT
|
||
3. SAFE PLACE
|
||
4. ENDURING ENERGY
|
||
5. KINDRED COLLABORATORS
|
||
|
||
### 2. ATMOSPHERE
|
||
|
||
_Establish a home for the study group that is centrally located, comfortable,
|
||
aesthetically pleasing, and conducive to dialogue._
|
||
|
||
1. COMMON GROUND
|
||
2. PUBLIC LIVING ROOM
|
||
3. INTIMATE CIRCLE
|
||
4. VIRTUAL SPACE
|
||
|
||
### 3. ROLES
|
||
|
||
_Lead and energize the group, come prepared, and help guide dialogues so
|
||
that they are insightful and productive._
|
||
|
||
1. ENTHUSIASTIC LEADER
|
||
2. MOTIVATED MODERATOR
|
||
3. ACTIVE PARTICIPANT
|
||
4. PREPARED PARTICIPANT
|
||
5. DISTINGUISHED PARTICIPANT
|
||
|
||
### 4. CUSTOMS
|
||
|
||
_Follow customs that will re-enforce the spirit of the group, piquing
|
||
participant's interest in dialogues, accommodating different learning levels,
|
||
making the study of literature easier, recording group experiences, and
|
||
drawing people closer together._
|
||
|
||
1. OPENING QUESTION
|
||
2. SEQUENTIAL STUDY
|
||
3. AGENDA
|
||
4. SUBGROUP
|
||
5. STUDY CYCLE
|
||
6. DISTRIBUTED DIARY
|
||
7. AFTER HOURS
|
||
|
||
## 1. Spirit
|
||
|
||
### 1.1 Knowledge Hydrant
|
||
|
||
> . . . where can one obtain knowledge in its fullest, unfiltered, unsimplified, form?
|
||
|
||
This ignorance about great literature is widespread. It exists today primarily
|
||
because several important ideas about great literature have been forgotten.
|
||
These include some of the following facts:
|
||
|
||
- The hard work put into the study of great literature is worthwhile because
|
||
it ensures that people retain the knowledge they wish to obtain
|
||
- Great literature is much easier to understand when it is studied in an
|
||
intelligent sequence ([4.2 SEQUENTIAL STUDY](#42-sequential-study))
|
||
- It is easier and more rewarding to study great literature with other people ([1.2 POOL OF INSIGHT)](#12-pool-of-insight))
|
||
|
||
**Discover the great literature in your profession or area of
|
||
interest—the finest books, articles, and speeches ever
|
||
written—and then begin an earnest study of these works.**
|
||
|
||
So how do you find the great literature worthy of study? Ask people. Ask
|
||
knowledgeable people which authors they like, what are their favorite books,
|
||
what profoundly influenced them?
|
||
|
||
After identifying the works, form or join a study group ([1.2 POOL OF INSIGHT](#12-pool-of-insight)), order the works
|
||
to be studied ([4.2 SEQUENTIAL STUDY](#42-sequential-study)), and compose an [4.3 AGENDA](#43-agenda).
|
||
|
||
### 1.2 Pool of Insight
|
||
|
||
> . . . once you've discovered your [KNOWLEDGE HYDRANT](#11-knowledge-hydrant), it can be overwhelming to drink from it. This pattern suggests how to make the study
|
||
> of great literature easier and more rewarding.
|
||
|
||
**To obtain the fullest understanding of great literature--to penetrate its
|
||
meaning – it is tremendously helpful to read and study a work on one's own
|
||
and then engage in meaningful dialogue on the work with others.**
|
||
|
||
In dialogue, people get the chance to learn from themselves and from their
|
||
colleagues. In communicating how they understand something, people may:
|
||
|
||
- clarify what confused others
|
||
- expose their own misunderstandings
|
||
- reveal new ideas
|
||
- articulate that which they didn't know they knew
|
||
|
||
There is a spirit present in dialogues that one doesn't
|
||
find in many other learning environments. Frequent meetings help sustain this
|
||
spirit. **When a group doesn't meet frequently, it can struggle to keep its
|
||
momentum and enthusiasm**; lively subjects and debates can fade between
|
||
meetings, and if people miss just one meeting, they will be absent for a very
|
||
long period. **Many groups sustain a group's spirit by meeting weekly or
|
||
biweekly**.
|
||
|
||
Group study also helps motivate people to learn, especially when they are no
|
||
longer officially "in school." A reading assignment every week or every other
|
||
week can help individuals continue to learn while balancing work and family
|
||
life.
|
||
|
||
**Read and study literature on one's own, but discuss it with
|
||
others in a regular study group. Aim to ask questions about
|
||
what you don't know and explain what you do know. Your
|
||
exchanges with colleagues will enrich your understanding
|
||
immensely.**
|
||
|
||
The best study groups are those in which individuals feel comfortable
|
||
learning with others ([1.3 SAFE PLACE](#13-safe-place)).
|
||
|
||
Atmosphere plays an important role in a dialogue. Some environments
|
||
promote dialogues ([2.1 COMMON GROUND](#21-common-ground), [2.2 PUBLIC LIVING ROOM](#22-public-living-room))
|
||
and some don't.
|
||
|
||
The most enriching study happens when a group has a [MOTIVATED
|
||
MODERATOR](#32-motivated-moderator) and [PREPARED PARTICIPANTS](#34-prepared-participant)...
|
||
|
||
### 1.3 SAFE PLACE
|
||
|
||
It is so important that a place of learning be a safe place. People need to feel
|
||
that they can experiment, or be wrong, for almost everyone becomes
|
||
uncomfortable if they fear that anything they say will be harshly criticized.
|
||
When places of learning have highly critical or judgmental natures, an
|
||
individual's ability to learn can easily be compromised.
|
||
|
||
In dialogue, participants must be comfortable to ask questions, even illogical,
|
||
overly simple, or silly questions. **It is the group's task to handle such
|
||
questions in such a way that individuals aren't stifled, or embarrassed, but
|
||
encouraged to continue learning**.
|
||
|
||
All participants within a dialogue need to help establish the safe place.
|
||
Usually, it is up to the [MOTIVATED MODERATOR](#32-motivated-moderator) to be especially
|
||
vigilant. With great diversity in a group-- people who are provocative or
|
||
reserved, skeptical or generous, newcomers or veterans --it is very easy for
|
||
study group sessions to become unsafe.
|
||
|
||
Maintaining a safe place is easier if a group establishes customs. Such
|
||
customs can help participants and moderators know what to do when different
|
||
types of discord arise
|
||
|
||
> Establish a warm, tolerant, polite and focused environment
|
||
> in which individuals help each other and where everyone is
|
||
> comfortable to ask questions and make mistakes.
|
||
|
||
### 1.4 ENDURING ENERGY
|
||
|
||
> It's fairly easy to start a study group. But keeping it going,
|
||
> so that members are active, dialogues are insightful, and the
|
||
> group is long-lived, is another matter altogether.
|
||
|
||
A study group's energy initially comes from its founder. If the founder is
|
||
genuinely interested in creating a thriving, long-lasting [POOL OF INSIGHT](#12-pool-of-insight),
|
||
to improve himself and his community, the group will start life with a
|
||
powerful energy. But if the founder is merely interested in short-term gains,
|
||
or personal recognition, the group will be short-lived.
|
||
|
||
#### Frequent Meetings
|
||
|
||
It is difficult to maintain any sort of flow, or continuous energy, if a
|
||
group doesn't meet very often. When a group is studying a body of
|
||
knowledge, a month between meetings is usually far too long for people
|
||
to maintain focus and enthusiasm. Therefore, have the group meet
|
||
weekly or bi-weekly. **These frequent meetings will allow a group to
|
||
study effectively, and may lead some members to become [KINDRED
|
||
COLLABORATORS](#15-kindred-collaborators)**.
|
||
|
||
#### Hour Meetings
|
||
|
||
A one-hour meeting is typically not enough time for a group to have an
|
||
insightful dialogue on a piece of literature. But three hours is too much
|
||
time, since most participants can't actively engage in dialogue for that
|
||
long. Therefore, **limit dialogues to a maximum of 2 hours, and if energy
|
||
has waned significantly before that time, finish the meeting early**.
|
||
|
||
#### Short Breaks
|
||
|
||
At a certain time in a dialogue, a group's intensity, focus and
|
||
effectiveness will begin to diminish. If the group doesn't take a break at
|
||
this time, the quality of the dialogue may begin to deteriorate, and people
|
||
will become uncomfortable. Therefore, **allow for a short (ten or fifteen
|
||
minute) break in the middle of a study group session**, to let members
|
||
reflect, chat, use the restrooms, and prepare for the next half of the
|
||
dialogue.
|
||
|
||
Equally important, is a group's meeting quarters, since the location and space
|
||
will play a huge role in sustaining a group's energy. People need to be excited
|
||
about attending a group.
|
||
|
||
> Create study groups out of genuine enthusiasm to study a
|
||
> subject in-depth. Meet weekly or bi-weekly for two hours,
|
||
> and have a short break in the middle. Choose a meeting
|
||
> location where people will enjoy passing time, and study only
|
||
> those writings which are worthy of the group's attention.
|
||
|
||
### 1.5 KINDRED COLLABORATORS
|
||
|
||
Join or form a small group that meets regularly and studies ideas that are
|
||
important to you. As you get to know people, valuable, career-enhancing
|
||
collaborations will develop.
|
||
|
||
## 2. ATMOSPHERE
|
||
|
||
### 2.1 COMMON GROUND
|
||
|
||
People want to connect with others but aren't willing
|
||
to do so in settings that make them feel uncomfortable. Location plays a vital role in the life of a group.
|
||
|
||
> Oldenburg's thesis is that people need informal public places
|
||
> where they can gather, put aside the concerns of work and
|
||
> home, relax, and talk. Germany's beer gardens, England's
|
||
> pubs, and French and Viennese cafes created this outlet in
|
||
> people's lives, providing a neutral ground where all are equal
|
||
> and conversation is the main activity.
|
||
|
||
> Hold public study groups where diverse individuals will all
|
||
> be on common ground. The best locations are easy for
|
||
> people to get to, but not too close to their offices or homes.
|
||
|
||
### 2.2 PUBLIC LIVING ROOM
|
||
|
||
Great locations for study groups resemble large, comfortable living rooms. There are various types of chairs that may be rearranged, perhaps a sofa and rugs, some lamps or other warm lighting, and windows. When people feel comfortable they forget about themselves and may freely engage in dialogue.
|
||
|
||
_Some of the best locations are quiet, aesthetic places that invite reflection_: a centrally located cafe, a spacious gallery or bookstore, a room with a magnificent view, or some nook or corner of a hotel or lodge.
|
||
|
||
> Place each sitting space in a position which is protected, not
|
||
> cut by paths or movements, roughly circular, made so that
|
||
> the room itself helps suggest the circle - not too strongly -
|
||
> with paths and activities around it, so that people naturally
|
||
> gravitate toward the chairs when they get into the mood to
|
||
> sit. Place the chairs and cushions loosely in the circle, and
|
||
> have a few too many.
|
||
|
||
> Choose a warm, spacious establishment where people will
|
||
> enjoy mingling before and after study sessions, where there
|
||
> is comfortable, rearrangeable furniture, plenty of warm lighting, and a variety of foods and drinks.
|
||
|
||
### 2.3 INTIMATE CIRCLE
|
||
|
||
> Awkward seating arrangements alienate people and thwart a
|
||
> group's ability to work together. The best configurations
|
||
> allow participants to easily see and hear each other. Yet
|
||
> many establishments don't provide either the furniture or
|
||
> space to make this happen, or don't let groups rearrange the
|
||
> furniture.
|
||
|
||
> ...**people will feel oppressed, both when they are either
|
||
working in an undifferentiated mass of workers and when
|
||
they are forced to work in isolation**. The small group
|
||
> achieves a nice balance between the one extreme in which
|
||
> there are so many people, that there is no opportunity for an
|
||
> intimate social structure to develop, and the other extreme in
|
||
> which there are so few, that the possibility of social groups
|
||
> does not occur at all.
|
||
> ...
|
||
> In our own survey of attitudes towards workspace -- taken
|
||
> among workers at the Berkeley City Hall -- **we found that
|
||
people prefer to be part of a group that ranges from two to
|
||
eight.** When there are more than eight, people lose touch
|
||
> with the group as a human gathering.
|
||
|
||
> Choose a location with ample room, many tables and chairs,
|
||
> and the freedom to rearrange the spaces to form rough
|
||
> circles or ovals that may dynamically expand or contract.
|
||
|
||
### 2.4 VIRTUAL SPACE
|
||
|
||
> Without an online presence, a study group will lack a cost-effective way of advertising its existence, organizing
|
||
> events,
|
||
> staying connected and attracting new members.
|
||
|
||
The trick to building a good site, is to avoid loading the site with too much
|
||
content that will regularly change, and to enlist the group's participants to
|
||
maintain the content that will need routine updating.
|
||
|
||
If the study group keeps a [DISTRIBUTED DIARY](#46-distributed-diary) or provides feedback
|
||
to authors, it is a good idea to post this material to the site, for the edification
|
||
of group members, and to foster online dialogue. For conducting such
|
||
dialogues, a simple, group email server or service (such as eGroups) is useful.
|
||
[AGENDA](#43-agenda) are particularly helpful for members and non-members of a
|
||
group and are therefore best placed on the site. A good agenda will span
|
||
several months, giving people the chance to plan their schedules and study
|
||
readings prior to group meetings ([3.4 PREPARED PARTICIPANT](#34-prepared-participant)).
|
||
|
||
> Establish an online presence where the study group's
|
||
> mission, activities, and [DISTRIBUTED DIARIES](#46-distributed-diary) are posted, where members may continue
|
||
> dialogues, or chat, and where prospective members may learn more about the
|
||
> group.
|
||
|
||
## 3. ROLES
|
||
|
||
### 3.1 ENTHUSIASTIC LEADER
|
||
|
||
> When a group doesn't have a leader who is passionate about
|
||
> the subject and determined to nourish and maintain its
|
||
> energy and culture, a group can languish, and possibly not
|
||
> survive.
|
||
|
||
The best leaders are those who are genuinely enthusiastic about a group's
|
||
mission. Such individuals will lead by example and seek to make the group
|
||
thrive, through continuous improvement.
|
||
|
||
- Leaders will help ensure that [AGENDAS](#43-agenda) are kept up to date, and that the
|
||
readings being selected are worthy of the group's attention.
|
||
|
||
- To inspire a group, a leader may plan special events at which authors or
|
||
leading scholars visit and participate in dialogues ([DISTINGUISHED
|
||
PARTICIPANT](#35-distinguished-participant)).
|
||
|
||
- To help keep a group informed and to attract new faces, a leader will help
|
||
produce an informative Website ([VIRTUAL SPACE](#24-virtual-space)) and will encourage
|
||
others to invite new members to the group.
|
||
|
||
- Should other groups attempt to subsume the group, the leader will step in to
|
||
either prevent a take-over or to explore the idea with the group.
|
||
|
||
- If a group's meeting location is no longer working for a group, the leader will
|
||
work with others to help find a more suitable location.
|
||
|
||
> Lead study groups by example and with enthusiasm. Make
|
||
> them places where people want to be, and invite the greater
|
||
> community to participate. Energize members with
|
||
> stimulating events, virtual dialogues, and seek to
|
||
> continuously improve the group by listening closely to
|
||
> member's ideas.
|
||
|
||
### 3.2 MOTIVATED MODERATOR
|
||
|
||
> Without a moderator, dialogues may wander aimlessly,
|
||
> arguments may erupt, people may talk on top of each
|
||
> another, and a group may fail to ever explore an author's
|
||
> deeper meanings.
|
||
|
||
The following practices define what good study group moderators do:
|
||
|
||
#### Prepare thoroughly
|
||
|
||
When a moderator doesn't prepare thoroughly for a session, when he or
|
||
she doesn't read thoroughly, or discover important questions about a
|
||
reading, or understand a moderator's responsibilities, the quality of a
|
||
dialogue may be compromised. **Therefore, moderators must prepare
|
||
thoroughly before sessions and understand how to effectively moderate**.
|
||
|
||
#### Ask the opening question
|
||
|
||
Asking challenging, penetrating questions about a reading is essential to
|
||
establishing engaging, enlightening dialogue. **Therefore, moderators
|
||
must discover important questions, and ask and re-ask these questions at
|
||
the beginning and throughout a session [OPENING QUESTION](#41-opening-question)**.
|
||
|
||
#### Resuscitate deteriorating dialogues
|
||
|
||
Dialogues can deteriorate easily: they can slow to a crawl, fail to be
|
||
engaging, get way off track or become too argumentative. Therefore,
|
||
**moderators must promptly diagnose problems and resuscitate dialogues
|
||
accordingly**.
|
||
|
||
#### Handle side conversations
|
||
|
||
A group may effectively participate in only one discussion at a time.
|
||
Therefore, **side conversations must promptly be quieted or politely
|
||
postponed**.
|
||
|
||
#### Refocus by reading
|
||
|
||
Inattention to an author's words can produce lengthy, unproductive, off-topic conversations or can lead to wayward
|
||
arguments that would cease to exist if a group merely studied a relevant passage. Therefore, **to refocus a group on an
|
||
author's content, moderators may read significant passages out loud**.
|
||
|
||
#### Let people speak
|
||
|
||
Active participants (i.e. people who talk a lot) or veteran members of a
|
||
group, can sometimes make it hard for less active, or newer members of a
|
||
group to effectively participant in a discussion. Therefore, **when
|
||
participants struggle to join a dialogue or get a word in edgewise,
|
||
moderators must step in and give these individuals opportunities to be
|
||
heard**.
|
||
|
||
#### Challenge groundless criticism
|
||
|
||
Non-specific or detail-free criticism, like "I just didn't like it", fails to
|
||
enlighten anyone and isn't helpful to a dialogue. Therefore, **moderators
|
||
must challenge groundless criticism**, often by asking individuals what
|
||
exactly they disliked.
|
||
|
||
#### Rotate Moderators
|
||
|
||
**A moderator who really knows a particular piece of literature and also
|
||
knows how to moderate, is a lot better than a moderator who only knows
|
||
how to moderate but doesn't know the literature.** Therefore, rotate
|
||
moderators, particularly when individuals are expert in various readings,
|
||
but also to give others a chance at playing the role.
|
||
|
||
#### Background Requirements
|
||
|
||
It's great if everyone participates in a dialogue, provided that everyone is
|
||
on the same page: if an individual is clearly way over his or her head, it
|
||
may mean that the individual needs to catch up to the group by studying
|
||
some previous papers or books. Therefore, **moderators must gage
|
||
whether participants are dragging a group down with unrelated or
|
||
unnecessary questions, and if they are, the moderator needs to politely
|
||
tell the participant to do some homework or form or join a [SUBGROUP](#44-subgroup)**.
|
||
|
||
#### Elucidation Statement or Questions
|
||
|
||
If a part of a group simply isn't understanding something, and it is
|
||
holding back the rest of the group, or the misunderstanding is leading to
|
||
more confusion, something needs to be done to clarify the confusion.
|
||
Therefore, **moderators must be aware of what is confusing people and
|
||
either ask questions that will help clarify the point or clearly explain the
|
||
point**.
|
||
|
||
#### Politeness & Patience
|
||
|
||
Rude behavior within a study group must never be allowed. Therefore,
|
||
**the moderator must make the peace, and get all members to understand
|
||
that all members need to respect each other, regardless of whether or not
|
||
they agree**.
|
||
|
||
> Moderate dialogues by asking penetrating questions, keeping
|
||
> dialogues focused, balancing diverse personalities, and
|
||
> helping group's increase their understanding. Give all
|
||
> members a chance to moderate, but let them choose when
|
||
> they want to play the role.
|
||
|
||
### 3.3 ACTIVE PARTICIPANT
|
||
|
||
> Anyone who is a member of a study group, or wants to join
|
||
> one, can find something lacking in an existing group: the
|
||
> meeting location, the number of people who attend, the
|
||
> literature being studied. Few of these things are incapable of
|
||
> change. However, too many people fail to realize that they
|
||
> can actively change a group, helping mold it to meet their
|
||
> needs
|
||
|
||
Each group is really shaped and managed by both its [ENTHUSIASTIC
|
||
LEADER](#31-enthusiastic-leader) and its regular participants. If the leader and the participants
|
||
work together, they can make the group a powerful educational center for
|
||
every participant.
|
||
|
||
Being an active participant doesn't just mean getting your needs met. It also
|
||
means helping others to get theirs needs met - and this can have a tremendous
|
||
effect on the group's lifespan.
|
||
|
||
> Actively and patiently shape a study group by seeing to it
|
||
> that the group meets your needs. Work with the group's
|
||
> leader to introduce change, and create customs, like
|
||
[SUBGROUPS](#44-subgroup), to make it easier for the group to
|
||
> accommodate diverse needs. Actively help others, particularly
|
||
> newer members of a group, so that the group meets their
|
||
> needs and so that they become valuable participants in the
|
||
> larger group.
|
||
|
||
### 3.4 PREPARED PARTICIPANT
|
||
|
||
> When individuals don't study prior to a dialogue, they either
|
||
> add nothing to the dialogue, or add too much. The
|
||
> unprepared participant may ask questions that are off-track
|
||
> or elementary or may contribute ideas that misguide rather
|
||
> than further a productive inquiry.
|
||
|
||
If a group chooses to study some piece of literature, a participant who
|
||
thoroughly prepares will actively read and note:
|
||
|
||
- what they did and did not understand
|
||
- what they thought were key points
|
||
- what they did not agree with
|
||
- what ideas related to other writings
|
||
- how the work could be improved
|
||
|
||
Now it is not common for all participants within a dialogue to prepare
|
||
thoroughly. So what does a group do when an unprepared participant is
|
||
thwarting a dialogue? Since dialogues can handle only so many superfluous
|
||
contributions before they begin to sour, prepared participants need to be
|
||
vigilant and assist a dialogue's [MOTIVATED MODERATORs ](#32-motivated-moderator) in
|
||
assertively keeping things focused, civil, and productive.
|
||
|
||
Another technique, which is far from optimal but sometimes necessary for
|
||
groups with busy professionals, gives people time to read and discuss
|
||
passages when the group meets. This does not usually give a group a chance
|
||
to get a deep understanding of a reading, but it can be a way to launch a
|
||
dialogue if few have had time to prepare.
|
||
|
||
> Study literature thoroughly prior to each study session.
|
||
> Select great literature for study since people will be more
|
||
> motivated to study it over lesser works. Make each reading
|
||
> assignment manageable -- not too small or too large, but
|
||
> commensurate with a group's abilities and the density of
|
||
> each reading.
|
||
|
||
### 3.5 DISTINGUISHED PARTICIPANT
|
||
|
||
> Individuals who are distinguished in their fields often lecture
|
||
> to large audiences. These lectures tend to be far less
|
||
> educational–for the lecturer and the listeners–than a good
|
||
> dialogue.
|
||
|
||
> Veteran educators Dani and Jerry Weinberg are fond of a quote from a friend
|
||
> who once described the lecture method as "a way of getting material from the
|
||
> teacher's notes into the student's notes--without passing through the brain of
|
||
> either one." ([Weinberg1999], p. 1)
|
||
|
||
For study groups, it is optimal if a distinguished individual comes to
|
||
participate in the group's dialogue as an equal member.
|
||
|
||
> Invite distinguished people to attend a study group and
|
||
> participate in dialogue. Such individuals will energize the
|
||
> group, and help foster great dialogues. Let everyone in a
|
||
> group have an opportunity to participant in dialogue with
|
||
> such an individual, either by forming larger-than-normal
|
||
> circles, or by scheduling multiple study sessions over the
|
||
> course of weeks or months.
|
||
|
||
## 4. CUSTOMS
|
||
|
||
### 4.1 OPENING QUESTION
|
||
### 4.2 SEQUENTIAL STUDY
|
||
### 4.3 AGENDA
|
||
### 4.4 SUBGROUP
|
||
### 4.5 STUDY CYCLE
|
||
### 4.6 DISTRIBUTED DIARY
|
||
### 4.7 AFTER HOURS
|