update
This commit is contained in:
parent
fd2cfaba66
commit
c620e6b14a
18 changed files with 543 additions and 4 deletions
16
Readwise/Why Gumroad Didn't Choose htmx.md
Normal file
16
Readwise/Why Gumroad Didn't Choose htmx.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
|||
# Why Gumroad Didn't Choose htmx
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
## Metadata
|
||||
- Author: [[Sahil Lavingia]]
|
||||
- Full Title: Why Gumroad Didn't Choose htmx
|
||||
- Category: #articles
|
||||
- URL: https://htmx.org/essays/why-gumroad-didnt-choose-htmx/
|
||||
- Archive: https://web-archive.alecodes.page/bookmarks?bf=1&search=&title=Why%20Gumroad%20Didn%27t%20Choose%20htmx
|
||||
> [!tldr]
|
||||
> Gumroad initially considered using htmx for their new project, Helper, but found it didn't meet their needs as they grew. They switched to React and Next.js, which provided a better user experience and easier development. This experience highlighted the importance of choosing technologies that align with project complexity and long-term goals.
|
||||
|
||||
## Highlights
|
||||
“HTMX is (officially) a meme to make fun of how overly complicated the JS landscape has gotten - much like tailwind is just a different syntax for inline CSS, HTMX is a different syntax for inline JS.” [View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01j9k9tx30e5kw6zm07drhw8gv))
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue